
Daily May 15 - June 4
2:00-4:45
SLC 147
Office: Candler 322
email: csallen@uga.edu
Voice: 706-542-2984
Course Web Pages:
Web CT
http://csallen.myweb.uga.edu/3300.htm
Office Hours:
Daily: 1:00 - 2:00
And By Appointment
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Comparative political themes in political science. The transition from feudalism to capitalism, state building, democracy, and interaction between political institutions and cultures in various politics. Examples will be drawn from developed, communist/post-communist and developing political systems.
PREREQUISITE: POLS 1101 or INTL 1100
1. RATIONALE
INTL 3300 is the University of Georgia’s introduction to comparative politics. The course will try to accomplish three things.
First, you will begin learning about other countries and their politics. We will divide them into three groups of countries:
Finally, you will also be clarifying your own values. Anytime you learn about other countries and their policies you all but inevitably call your own expectations and preferences into question. By continually using the U.S. as a frame of reference and dealing with controversial issues and ideas, we hope to spark lively and enjoyable arguments about the ideological questions that are at the heart of politics.
There is no orthodoxy to comparative politics. Often courses such as these lack a clear focus and merely describe the day-to-day workings of different governments, a kind of "nuts and bolts" approach. To avoid that problem, we will build this course around democracy – what it is, what it is not – and how our countries have taken very different approaches in trying to achieve it.
2. ORGANIZATION
The course has three parts. In the introduction, we will start with the most basic question – what is comparative politics? Particularly important is how the international political and economic systems increasingly impinge on the domestic politics of all countries, including our own. We will then examine different conceptions of democracy, and suggest that each of the three groups of countries we will examine later may define – and claim to practice – democracy in very different ways.
In the second part of the course, the bulk of the MayMester, we will examine closely each of the three groups of countries. Some countries will be addressed via the lectures and readings together, while other countries will only be addressed in the readings. In other words, your ability to draw themes and examples from your independent research will prove essential to do well in the course. In this middle section of the course, you will learn something of the "nuts and bolts" of the politics of each country, but you will do so in the context of the concept of democracy. To what extent have these countries practiced different forms of democracy, and how does an understanding of the principles of democracy help you to understand political change?
The third part will use the final days to pull the course together. This will not be a review in the conventional sense. Rather it will offer you an opportunity to re-examine your own conceptions of democracy in the context of the course material. Moreover, this approach will also attempt to help you to see the links between comparative politics, American politics, international relations and political theory. Too often in courses such as this, divisions among the other parts of the discipline of political science are accentuated. A major goal of the course will be to break down these sometimes too rigid barriers and show how comparative approaches help in understanding other portions of the discipline of political science.
This is not a course that requires you to supply the "correct" answers in your written assignments or in classroom discussions. Rather, a basic principle of the course is that learning must be a challenge and that you must pull material together on your own, and you must use your own values, imagination and other material you have learned to draw conclusions. In that sense, your writing must develop hypotheses, state clearly what you are trying to explain, develop a clear line of inquiry for your essays, and analyze as well as defend your argument.
We will meet for lectures for 150 minutes per day. At least every other day, we will have one of our Vox Populi sessions, a debate/discussion period in which class members will put forth a contentious position and attempt to defend it. In these discussions, a small group of students will be selected in advance to prepare their presentation; and then to lead the rest of the class in discussion. A significant portion of your class participation grade will depend on your performance in these sessions. Those students not leading the presentation are expected to participate in an open discussion of these selected themes.
On 3 occasions there will be films shown during class. These will be feature films or documentaries in which Americans often are seen engaging the politics of various countries or issues of comparative significance. All films highlight important aspects of the politics in each country. Vox Populi discussion sessions will follow each film.
Last but not least, the readings are designed to supplement and not repeat what is covered in lecture. Some of the readings appear more directly related to the lectures than are others, yet you will be responsible for all of them. Responsibility, however, does not mean memorization of facts. You will do much better if you can understand the broad themes and the spirit of the readings and then be able to use them in your discussions and papers. It should be obvious that your written work should draw on lectures, discussions, and the readings.
3. REQUIRED READINGS:
(Available in Bookstore and on Reserve)
Mark Kesselman, Joel Krieger, William Joseph, et al., Introduction to Comparative Politics, 4th ed. (Houghton Mifflin, 2007) ISBN: 0-61-860447-2
Robert Dahl, On Democracy (Yale University Press, 2000) ISBN 0-300-08455-2
Pamela Constable and Arturo Valenzuela, A Nation of Enemies (Norton,
1993) ISBN 0-393-30985-1
Jonas Pontusson, "Sweden 1-5", in Kesselman, Krieger, et al. European Politics in Transition, 2nd Ed. (D.C. Heath: Lexington, MA, 1992). Exceptionally useful for the period before 1990.
Bo Rothstein. (2001). "Social Capital in the Social Democratic Welfare State." Politics and Society 29(2):207-241.
Arter, David. (2003). "Scandinavia: What's Left is the Social Democratic Welfare Consensus." Parliamentary Affairs 56(1):75-98.
Bergqvist, Christina. (2004). "Gender (In)equality, European Integration and the Transition of Swedish Corporatism." Economic and Industrial Democracy 25(1):125-146.
Nef, Jorge, (2003) "The Chilean Model: Fact and Fiction." Latin American Perspectives 30(5):16-40
Joel Krieger, ed., The Oxford Companion to Politics of the World 2nd. Ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Biddle and Holland, Writers’ Guide: Political Science.
Cochrane, James. Between You and I: A Little Book of Bad English (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)
COPIES OF ALL REQUIRED READINGS ARE ALSO ON RESERVE IN THE LIBRARY
5. SUGGESTED READINGS
(These are works that you might find helpful in preparing your written assignments. Pick and choose among those that you think might be most helpful.)
Timothy Tilton, (1987) "Why Don’t the Swedish Social Democrats Nationalize Industry?" Scandinavian Studies 52(2):142-166.
Rianne Mahon, (2000) "Swedish Social Democracy: Death of a Model?" Studies in Political Economy, 63: 27-60.
Jonas Pontusson, "Sweden: After the Golden Age," in Perry Anderson and Patrick Camillier, eds., Mapping the European Left (London: Verso, 1994), pp. 23-54.
Nicholas Aylott, Swedish Social Democracy and European Integration (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999). [HC 241.25 .S8 A95 1999]
Bo Rothstein, The Social Democratic State (University of Pittsburgh Press, 1996)
Jean Bethke Elshtain, Democracy on Trial (New York: Basic, 1995).
Gosta Esping-Andersen, Welfare States in Transition (London: Sage, 1996).
Arturo Valenzuela, "Judging the General: Pinochet’s Past and Chile’s Future." Current History (March 1999), pp. 99-104.
J. Samuel Valenzuela and Timothy R. Scully, "Electoral Choices and the Party System in Chile." Comparative Politics (July 1997), pp. 511-527.
John K. Galbraith, The Good Society (Houghton Mifflin, 1996).
Harvey Cox, "The Market as God." Atlantic Monthly, April 1999.
Robert Kuttner, "Globalism Bites Back." American Prospect, March 1998.
Geoffrey Barraclough, An Introduction to Contemporary History. A readable, short history of the economic and political changes affecting the nations of all three worlds from the late 19th to the mid 20th centuries.
Gosta Esping-Andersen, Politics Against Markets. (Princeton, 1985). A book that analyzes democracy vs capitalism in Northern Europe.
Robert Dahl, A Preface to Economic Democracy (California, 1985). Short, theoretical work on democratizing the economy.
Simon Kuper, Football Against the Enemy. Not about American gridiron football but about the sport known as football in the rest of the world: soccer. The book is a provocative treatment of the intersection of sports and politics.
C.B. Macpherson, The Real World of Democracy. A short book which raises the provocative issue that democracy can be defined differently in different countries.
Roy Medvedev, Let History Judge. Critical view of 20th century Russian and Soviet history.
Carole Pateman, Participation and Democratic Theory. A short, classic work examining democratic theory and practice.
James Petras, "Authoritarianism, Democracy and the Transition to Socialism." The Socialist Register (1985/86), pp. 268-294.
John Reed, Ten Days that Shook the World. Famous diary of the 1917 Russian Revolution by an American journalist who was there – and participated.
Hedrick Smith, The Russians. 20th century overview of Russian people by former NY Times reporter.
United States Senate, Covert Action in Chile - 1963-1973. Senate investigation into US-supported coup in Chile.
Arturo Valenzuela, The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile A short overview of the breakdown of Chilean democracy in 1973.
J. Samuel Valenzuela and Arturo Valenzuela, eds., Military Rule in Chile A collection of articles assessing the performance of the former military government in Chile.
There are powerful and fast-moving changes underway in all countries. The European Union’s expansion has had a powerful impact on sovereign European nation states. Changes in Russia have occurred at a dizzying pace. And the massive political changes in Latin American countries such as Chile, Venezuela and Mexico have been profound. Consequently, relying on just the texts will not be sufficient. You are also required to keep up with contemporary political developments in the three groups of countries.
Perhaps the most important single periodical source is the New York Times. Anything relevant to the course that shows up in the Times, will be fair game. You may get a daily (weekday) subscription for a very reasonable fee for the entire semester. I have a subscription form for those who want to subscribe to a hardcopy. For those who don't, your best bet will be to check the paper’s website daily.
Among the additional periodicals that can help you follow contemporary developments are: The Wall Street Journal, The Christian Science Monitor, Business Week, The Economist, In These Times, The Nation, The American Prospect, and The New Republic.
Please consult the course web pages listed above – particularly the WWW Research Links section for links to the websites of periodicals, research institutions and other useful resources. New links are added frequently.
7. COURSE MECHANICS
Each student will complete the following assignments:
Take "The Political Compass" Quiz (see weblinks page) but keep the results to yourself.
A mid term paper (5-7 pages) due on May 24th. The topic will be posted on the assignments webpage by Thursday evening, the 17th. The topic will principally involve issues concerning Sweden, but you will be required to draw comparative evidence from at least two additional developed countries (Britain, France, Germany) other than the United States.
A final take home paper (7-9 pages). The specific question will be given out by May 29th. (It will be due on June 4th, the last day of class,. This will be a comprehensive final paper, in which you will need to draw on material from at least 2 countries from each of the three sections of the course.
Just before writing your final paper, take "The Political Compass" Quiz again.
In other words, for both papers you will need to do extensive reading on your own from ALL course texts and integrate selected themes and points into your essays.
You will be graded as follows:
Take home end-term paper 50%
Discussion/Participation 20%
8. GROUND RULES
Section I
How do we define politics? In what way do our definitions reflect our values as Americans? What are the main ways of looking at other political systems? How do international economic and political constraints limit what individual nation-states can do?
REQUIRED READING: May 15
Soe, Annual Editions: Comparative Politics, Unit 1 - Pluralist Democracies: Country Studies.
DEMOCRACY AND AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM.
How does democracy differ in each of the three worlds? Why do they have different images of democracy? How can democracy best be achieved? What forces threaten democracy? Why is American democracy different from other democracies?
REQUIRED READING: May 16-18
Dahl, On Democracy (begin).
Section II
1. DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
Why is Sweden considered the prototypical European social democratic state. How do parliamentary systems different from ours and why is that important? How does it differ from other Western European States? What are the current policy problems which democracies in other advanced developed countries face and how are they similar to those in the United States? How are they different?
REQUIRED READING: May 19-23
Bo Rothstein. (2001). "Social Capital in the Social Democratic Welfare State." Politics and Society 29(2):207-241. (reserve)
Arter, David. (2003). "Scandinavia: What's Left is the Social Democratic Welfare Consensus." Parliamentary Affairs 56(1):75-98. (reserve)
Bergqvist, Christina. (2004). "Gender (In)equality, European Integration and the Transition of Swedish Corporatism." Economic and Industrial Democracy 25(1):125-146. (reserve)
Kesselman, Krieger, Joseph, ICP, "Democracies" (2 countries of your choice).
Soe, Unit 3. Europe in Transition — West, Center, and East, Parts A & B.
How can these systems even be thought of as democratic? What are the main institutions and why do they have (or not have) power? How do Russian (and former Soviet) institutions and practices reflect Russian history? What does democracy in China mean?
REQUIRED READING: May 24-28
Soe, Unit 3. Europe—West, Center, and East: Part B "Russia"; Unit 4 Political Diversity in the Developing World: Part C: China
DeBardeleben, "Russia," in Kesselman and Krieger, Joseph, et. al.
Joseph, "China" in Kesselman,
Krieger, Joseph, et al.
REQUIRED READING: May 29 - 31
Constable & Valenzuela (entire);
Nef, Jorge, (2003) "The Chilean Model: Fact and Fiction." Latin American Perspectives 30(5):16-40
Soe, Unit 4. Political Diversity in the Developing World: Parts A (Latin America), B (Africa), D (India), and E (The Muslim World).
Kesselman, Krieger, Joseph, et al. "Developing Countries" (2 countries of your choice).
Suggested Reading:
Valenzuela, "Judging the General..."
J.S. Valenzuela and Scully, "Electoral Choices..."
Section III
CONCLUSION
How is the struggle for democracy connected to such themes as: economic justice, human rights, industrial relations, international politics, and political development? How has globalization affected democratic theory and practice? How has your view of democracy changed since the first paper?
Dahl (complete)